{'It’s like they’ve erupted out of someone’s subconscious': how horror came to possess contemporary film venues.

The largest surprise the movie business has encountered in 2025? The return of horror as a leading genre at the UK film market.

As a style, it has remarkably outperformed past times with a annual growth of 22% for the British and Irish cinemas: £83.7 million in 2025, against £68.6 million last year.

“Last year, no horror film reached £10m at the UK or Irish box office. This year, five films have,” notes a box office editor.

The major successes of the year – Weapons (£11.4 million), Sinners (£16.2m), the latest Conjuring installment (£14.98m) and 28 Years Later (£15.54 million) – have all stayed in the theaters and in the audience's minds.

While much of the industry commentary highlights the standout quality of prominent auteurs, their achievements suggest something shifting between audiences and the style.

“Viewers often remark, ‘This is a must-see regardless of your genre preferences,’” explains a head of acquisition.

“Films like these play with genre and structure to create something completely different, and that speaks to an audience in a different way.”

But apart from artistic merit, the ongoing appeal of spooky films this year implies they are giving cinemagoers something that’s greatly desired: therapeutic relief.

“Right now, there’s a lot of anger, fear and division that’s being reflected in cinema,” notes a film commentator.

28 Years Later, a standout horror film of 2025, with Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Alfie Williams in key roles.

“Scary movies excel at tapping into viewers' fears, amplifying them, allowing you to set aside daily worries and concentrate on the on-screen terror,” explains a noted author of horror film history.

In the context of a global headlines featuring war, border tensions, far-right movements, and environmental crises, ghosts, monsters, and mythical entities resonate a bit differently with filmg oers.

“It’s been noted that vampire cinema thrives during periods of economic hardship,” comments an star from a recent horror hit.

“The concept reflects how economic systems can drain vitality from individuals.”

From film's inception, societal turmoil has shaped horror.

Experts highlight the rise of German expressionism after the the Great War and the unstable environment of the 1920s Europe, with features such as early expressionist works and Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror.

Subsequently came the economic crisis of the 30s and iconic horror characters.

“Consider the Dracula narrative: an outsider from the east brings a corrupting influence that permeates society and challenges its heroes,” says a academic.

“Therefore, it embodies concerns related to foreign influx.”

A 1920s film, The Cabinet of Dr Caligari, mirrored post-WWI societal tensions.

The boogeyman of migration shaped the newly launched rural fright a recent film title.

The filmmaker explains: “My goal was to examine populist trends. For instance, nostalgic phrases promising a return to a 'better' era that excluded many.”

“Additionally, the notion that acquaintances might unexpectedly voice extreme views, leaving others shocked.”

Perhaps, the present time of praised, culturally aware scary films started with a sharp parody launched a year after a divisive leadership period.

It introduced a recent surge of horror auteurs, including a range of talented artists.

“That period was incredibly stimulating,” says a creator whose film about a violent prenatal entity was one of the era’s tentpole movies.

“In my view, it marked the start of a phase where filmmakers embraced wildly creative horror with artistic ambitions.”

The director, currently developing another scary story, continues: “Over 10 years, audiences’ minds have been opening up to much more of that.”

A groundbreaking 2017 satire paved the way for a new era of socially aware horror.

At the same time, there has been a reconsideration of the underrated horror works.

Recently, a new cinema opened in London, showing underground films such as The Greasy Strangler, a classic adaptation and the 1989 remake of Dr Caligari.

The fresh acclaim of this “raw and chaotic” genre is, according to the venue creator, a clear response to the algorithmic content pumped out at the theaters.

“It counters the polished content from big producers. The industry has become blander and more foreseeable. Numerous blockbusters share the same traits,” he says.

“On the other hand, [these indie works] feel imperfect. They seem to burst forth from deep creativity, free from commercial constraints.”

Scary movies continue to challenge the norm.

“These movies uniquely blend vintage vibes with contemporary relevance,” notes an specialist.

Alongside the return of the mad scientist trope – with two adaptations of a well-known story upcoming – he predicts we will see fright features in the near future responding to our present fears: about tech supremacy in the coming decades and “monstrous metaphors in power structures”.

At the same time, a religious-themed scare film The Carpenter’s Son – which tells the story of holy family challenges after the messiah's arrival, and features celebrated stars as the sacred figures – is set for release later this year, and will undoubtedly create waves through the Christian right in the America.</

Katelyn Barnes
Katelyn Barnes

Elena is a literary historian and critic with a passion for uncovering hidden narratives in classic works.