🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue worked, and disclosed recent overtures had come from mediators to resume talks with the US government. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is walking a complex course since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations used their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be revived in certain ways if talks reopen.

The American leader last week said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his address to the conference, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister said the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by military means. He asserted the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Answer

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to enforce their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the primary solution to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the wake of this attack."